When it comes to vaccines, the story about a vaccine's "effect" is very different from what media reports. Media tells us that the point of a vaccine is to create immunity, herd immunity, and protection from illness.
But none of that has been carefully, scientifically tested
If you look at the clinical testing, at the “drug effect” that is measured and carefully tested, you'll discover it's antibody production. Did the clinical trial participants generate an adequate antibody response?...
If a vaccine produces antibodies - it's deemed "Effective!"
But, what’s lacking in that scientific study, is a measurement of duration. How long does the body retain that vaccine induced antibody level? Duration is a pretty critical factor in determining how effective a vaccine is, so why is duration never studied?
Most clinical trials only measure the antibody levels of participating individuals for a few weeks, or months following vaccination. For many vaccina...
Today, when people say "Vaccines work!" they believe that means "Vaccines create Immunity!" or herd immunity, etc. Such phrases have been used so often, interchangeably, and the phrase interchange has been showcased by the highest levels of government. One example can be witnessed during education provided by the CDC. During a webinar on measles, the nurse educator suggests that prior receipt of "two measles vaccines," is "evidence of immunity."
What if scientific truths are hidden from common public knowledge, using censorship, as well as illegal and fraudulent tactics.
The previous article quoted Cochrane, a highly respected and independent research group. They stated, "Conclusions favourable to the use of influenza vaccines were associated with a higher risk of bias. In these studies, the authors made claims and drew conclusions that were unsupported by the data they presented."