Chapter 3: Vaccine Effectiveness

The truth about a vaccine's "effect" is very different from what the media reports to us on the topic. The media tells us that a vaccine's effect is to create immunity, herd immunity, and protection from illness. 

But none of that has been carefully, scientifically tested and measured.

If you look at the clinical testing, at the “drug effect” that is measured and carefully tested, you'll discover it's antibody production. Did the clinical trial participants generate an ade...

If clinical testing shows a vaccine produces antibodies, it's deemed "Effective!" 

What’s lacking in that study though is a measurement of duration. How long does the body retain that vaccine induced antibody level? Duration is one pretty critical factor in determining how effective a vaccine might be, so why is duration never studied?

Most clinical trials only measure the antibody levels of participating individuals for a few weeks, or months following vaccinati...

It is a common belief that robust life lasting immunity results from antibodies, antibodies derived from either the vaccine or illness convalescence. 

But what if antibodies aren't needed?

Last century researchers made the shocking discovery that people who are incapable of producing antibodies are able to be fully immune to illnesses. A paper from 1974 explains: 

…children with antibody deficiency syndromes (specific deficiencies of the B cell system) have quite unremarkable attacks of measles wit...

Today, when people say "Vaccines work!" they believe that means "Vaccines create Immunity!" or herd immunity, etc. Such phrases have been used so often, interchangeably, and the phrase interchange has been showcased by the highest levels of government. One example can be witnessed during education provided by the CDC. During a webinar on measles, the nurse educator say that prior receipt of "two measles vaccines," is "evidence of immunity."

But what ha...

HOW PROTECTIVE is the flu vaccine? That's a pretty important question.

Researchers actually measure this for flu, which often isn't done with the other illnesses. So what do the researchers discover year after year?

Today, media explains the findings to us as follows, "Your risk of contracting the flu is cut in half if you’re vaccinated!"

Well damn! That sounds like worthwhile protection. Doesn't it?

What I find interesting though is over the last decade it seems the rate of protection from flu...

​​Do vaccine makers promote data and research which casts negative spotlight onto their product?

Obviously no they don't. Why would they? 

Like all businesses, vaccine manufacturers shine light and promotion onto the best figures and best data - information that makes their product look awesome. 

In the previous article, I showed that media reports explain that flu vaccine reduces your risk of influenza by 50%. Despite media reports saying a vaccine is protective, if you read th...

What if scientific truths are hidden from common public knowledge, using censorship, as well as illegal and fraudulent tactics.

The previous article quoted Cochrane, a highly respected and independent research group. They stated, "Conclusions favourable to the use of influenza vaccines were associated with a higher risk of bias. In these studies, the authors made claims and drew conclusions that were unsupported by the data they presented."

Why would the study authors lie?

So far in this book,...

Please reload

In essence, society’s attention has become focused on vaccination, focused solely on this health treatment. But TREATMENT is not what creates health, treatment is what changes or manages a persons’ symptoms of poor health. Instead of focusing solely on the treatment, there needs to be a shift. We need to evaluate the treatment in the context of the whole - what is working about the treatment? What needs improving? What is failing completely? How does the treatment affect evolution of the species? And how can health be supported moving forward so that the treatment is no longer needed?
United States