In essence, society’s attention has become focused on vaccination, focused solely on this health treatment. But TREATMENT is not what creates health, treatment is what changes or manages a persons’ symptoms of poor health. Instead of focusing solely on the treatment, there needs to be a shift. We need to evaluate the treatment in the context of the whole - what is working about the treatment? What needs improving? What is failing completely? How does the treatment affect evolution of the species? And how can health be supported moving forward so that the treatment is no longer needed?
Canada
United States

Chapter 2 - SAFETY & EFFICACY

In a vaccine discussion it's often proclaimed, "The science is settled!" Well, I'd like to point out what the experts say about this settled and indisputable research which fills the medical journals.

Dr. Richard Horton is the Editor-in-Chief of the Lancet, which is one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world. He has stated that much of the published research filling the medical journals today is very poor in quality and even fraudulent. In an article he published wit...

When doctors all over the world emphatically state that vaccines are safe and effective, such emphasis implies, "What more is there to consider?"

Well to answer that, we need to look closer at the words safe and effective, by asking "What is the regulation process used to determine whether or not a drug is safe and effective?" 

In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determines that process. They govern and enforce the laws that the drug makers must follow, determining...

In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the testing process that each drug must pass, before the drug can be licensed and sold for use to the general public. In essence, the FDA enforces the laws that must be followed by vaccine and drug makers. The FDA is a division within the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS and is also known as HHS).

Take note, the HHS is the highest level of Government, and so this department oversees all things that are medi...

In Safety & Efficacy Part 2, I explained that David Graham, an FDA employee and whistleblower, stated that the FDA is good at ensuring drug makers prove efficacy (effectiveness) of the drug. In an interview he gave, he is quoted as saying: (emphasis mine)

In terms of confidence in what the FDA does, there are two things that the FDA determines when it looks at a drug: it determines whether or not a drug is safe and it determines whether or not it's effective. Regarding the det...

As stated in the previous article, there is definitive scientific evidence that demonstrates completely that vaccines generate an antibody response within the body. It's that measurement, whether or not the vaccine produces antibodies, which determines if the vaccine is "effective." And that's something that we hear everyday, that vaccines are "safe and effective." The medical and scientific definition for vaccine effectiveness, is that the vaccine produces an antibody response. What’s lacking...

All vaccines have different effectiveness successes and shortcomings, that can’t be summed up and captured in a one size fits all statement. Before I get to the section of this book, which goes in detail explaining the specifics of each illness and the effectiveness of each vaccine, I do feel it’s worthwhile to present flu data which will help you start to begin questioning the regular sound bites of information you hear through media. To do that, I’d like to discuss the efficacy testing which h...

​​In the previous articleI provided you the clinical trial results, as reported by the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline for their Flulaval-Tetra vaccine. I imagine you can already recognize that manufacturers typically only report on, and publish the data from clinical trials where the data was favourable for their product. Like any business, why would they publish or publicize data that wouldn’t positively promote their product?

In that previous article, the manufacturer testing showed that 100 peop...

Now it’s time to turn your attention onto a separate efficacy issue. In the previous articles I explained how scientific truths are distorted and magnified in vaccine messaging. I explained that in messaging, the media, the health authorities, and the manufacturers make claims for vaccines that have never actually been tested or proven. In the previous article, I showed how Cochrane, a highly respected and independent research group, was quoted as saying, "Conclusio...

March 24, 2017

I just read an article by Scary Mommy's Elizabeth Broadbent, and she states that anti-vaxxers (pro-choicers or ex-vaxxers are more appropriate labels for us) are in an uproar over the mumps outbreaks. In her article she briefly mentions the mumps fraud lawsuit, before she moves on to present information regarding the seriousness of mumps complications. She provides information regarding pre-vaccination/post-vaccination illness statistics, vaccine efficacy rates according to the CDC, and waning v...

Lets move our vaccine discussion beyond efficacy, for now, and instead turn our attention to safety. Again, the focus of discussion in this next series of articles will be how scientific facts about vaccine safety are either magnified, distorted, or denied completely, all to positively influence your opinion about vaccines. At no point in time am I saying there is zero scientific evidence which supports what the pro-vaccine are saying. The science that the pro-vaccine point to is often completel...

Please reload